From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nagerl v. Nagerl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 20, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502942.

December 20, 2007.

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court (Lebous, J.), entered February 28, 2007 in Tioga County, which, among other things, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Pope, Schrader Sacco, L.L.P., Binghamton (Kurt D. Schrader of counsel), for appellant.

Carman M. Garufi, Binghamton, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, Crew III, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


The parties were married in September 1999. Plaintiff commenced this action for divorce in March 2006 on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and abandonment. Thereafter, he discontinued his abandonment cause of action and moved for summary judgment on the remaining ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Although Supreme Court initially granted that motion, issuing a judgment of divorce, the court subsequently sua sponte vacated that judgment. The court thereafter issued an amended order again granting the motion, but directed that the judgment dissolving the marriage would not be entered until equitable distribution was resolved. Defendant appeals.

Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5) (a) states that "the court, in an action wherein all or part of the relief granted is divorce, . . . shall determine the respective rights of the parties in their separate or marital property, and shall provide for the disposition thereof in the final judgment." Since the amended order appealed from herein is interlocutory and failed to render a final award of equitable distribution, that order "is nothing more than a decision stating the intention on the part of the court to divorce the parties in the future and, as such, is both nonbinding and nonfinal" ( Sullivan v Sullivan, 174 AD2d 862, 862; see Garcia v Garcia, 178 AD2d 683, 683). Accordingly, the subject appeal must be dismissed.

In doing so, we decline defendant's request that this Court consider the merits of her appeal by departing from its established case law and adopt the rationale of the Fourth Department in Zack v Zack ( 183 AD2d 382 [1992]).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Nagerl v. Nagerl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 20, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Nagerl v. Nagerl

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW NAGERL, Respondent, v. MELITA NAGERL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 20, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 1199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 10017
848 N.Y.S.2d 426

Citing Cases

Nagerl v. Nagerl

This appeal by defendant ensued. This Court dismissed as premature defendant's appeal from the amended order…

Chang v. Yu-Jen Chang

Thus, the award of summary judgment to plaintiff is fully supported in the record. However, the order…