From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nageley, Meredith & Miller, Inc. v. Sharp (In re SK Foods L.P.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
Case No.: 2:12-CV-00940-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-CV-00940-JAM Case No.: 2:12-CV-00942-JAM Case No.: 2:12-CV-00943-JAM

07-02-2012

In re: SK FOODS L.P., A California Limited Partnership DEBTOR, NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC., Appellant, v. BRADLEY D. SHARP, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE, Appellee.

ANDREA M. MILLER [SBN: 88992] JAMES C. KEOWEN [SBN: 1733546] NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. Attorneys for Appellant NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. GREGORY C. NUTI [SBN: 151754[ KEVIN W. COLEMAN [SBN: 168538] MICHAEL M. CARLSON [SBN: 88048] MELISSA S. LOR [SBN: 245515] SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP Attorneys for Appellee BRADLEY D. SHARP, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE


ANDREA M. MILLER [SBN: 88992]

JAMES C. KEOWEN [SBN: 1733546]

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC.

Attorneys for Appellant NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC.

GREGORY C. NUTI [SBN: 151754[

KEVIN W. COLEMAN [SBN: 168538]

MICHAEL M. CARLSON [SBN: 88048]

MELISSA S. LOR [SBN: 245515]

SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

Attorneys for Appellee BRADLEY D. SHARP, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE

Bankruptcy Court Case No. 09-29162


Adversary Proceeding No:

09- 02692

10- 2014

10:2016


STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING

THE ABOVE-LISTED APPEALS FOR PURPOSES OF BRIEFING

The parties to the above captioned matters, through their counsel of record, hereby enter this Stipulation requesting the Court to consolidate the three appellate matters that are the subject of this Stipulation in order to permit the filing of a single Opening, Opposition and Reply Memorandum in the prosecution of these appeals.

The basis for this stipulation is that all three appeals address a single issue - the propriety of the Bankruptcy Court's Order sanctioning Appellant and awarding attorney's fees to the Appellee. The Bankruptcy Court issued a single Order, and entered a single Judgment, applicable to the three matters now appealed in the aggregate. Thus the issues on appeal can be addressed by a single set of briefs and a single Excerpt of Record and from each side of the controversy thereby avoiding unnecessary duplication and saving the time and effort of both the litigants and the Court.

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC.

By: _____________

JAMES C. KEOWEN

Attorneys For Appellant

SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

By _____________

KEVIN W. COLEMAN

Attorneys for Appellee

ORDER

The Court, having read the foregoing Stipulation of the parties, and being fully apprised of the facts and circumstances, hereby Orders that the three appeals identified in the caption to this Stipulation and Order shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument, and only one set of briefs and Excerpts of Record need to be filed in connection with these matters.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nageley, Meredith & Miller, Inc. v. Sharp (In re SK Foods L.P.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
Case No.: 2:12-CV-00940-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Nageley, Meredith & Miller, Inc. v. Sharp (In re SK Foods L.P.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: SK FOODS L.P., A California Limited Partnership DEBTOR, NAGELEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-CV-00940-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)