From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nagel v. Nagel

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One
Jan 17, 1978
561 S.W.2d 693 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 38910.

January 17, 1978.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, GEORGE W. CLOYD, J.

Dubail, Judge, Kilker Maier, William B. Smith, St. Louis, for appellant.

Daniel V. O'Brien, James T. O'Brien, St. Louis, for respondent.


Plaintiff-wife has appealed from a modification order in favor or defendant-husband wherein the trial court had reduced defendant's monthly child support obligation by $200.

When the marriage was dissolved in December of 1975 it was agreed the husband's monthly net income was $1,200, and the court had then awarded the wife $700 monthly child support. Two years later the husband moved to reduce the amount of child support, his monthly income having fallen by $140, from $1,200 to $1,060. The trial court granted the husband's motion by reducing his monthly child support obligation by $200, from $700 to $500. The wife has appealed, contending there was no evidentiary support for the reduction.

By § 452.370.1, VAMS, a child support decree may be modified "only upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable." We have scanned the record and find the only changed circumstance is the husband's $140 reduced monthly income. Only to that extent is the modification order supported by the evidence.

The modification order is remanded and the trial court is directed to amend its order, as of January 12, 1977, by reducing the monthly child support allowance from $700 to $560.

SMITH and McMILLIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nagel v. Nagel

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One
Jan 17, 1978
561 S.W.2d 693 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Nagel v. Nagel

Case Details

Full title:MADELYN M. NAGEL, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT M. NAGEL, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One

Date published: Jan 17, 1978

Citations

561 S.W.2d 693 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Witwicky v. Witwicky

E.g., Langwell v. Langwell, 559 S.W.2d 65, 66 (Mo.App. 1977). We do not address the question whether an…

Leimer v. Leimer

" But we held in Hutcherson v. Hutcherson, 553 S.W.2d 487, 488 (Mo.App. 1977) (decided under the "changed…