From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nafal v. Gaber

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 6, 2024
2:22-cv-05912-DSF-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-05912-DSF-AJR

06-06-2024

JULIAN AHAD JOSEPH NAFAL Plaintiff(s), v. MOHEN MOHAMMED GABER, et al. Defendant(s).


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to serve process on the defendants within 90 days of the filing of the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The Court may extend this deadline for good cause. Id. More than 90 days have passed since the complaint in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service for at least one defendant. Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause no later than June 20, 2024 why the unserved defendant(s) should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of proof(s) of service showing that the relevant defendant(s) was/were served within the 90-day period or a showing of good cause for extending the service period constitute adequate responses to this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nafal v. Gaber

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 6, 2024
2:22-cv-05912-DSF-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Nafal v. Gaber

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN AHAD JOSEPH NAFAL Plaintiff(s), v. MOHEN MOHAMMED GABER, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-05912-DSF-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)