From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naessens v. Las Vegas Metropolitian Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 2, 2023
2:22-cv-01438-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01438-JAD-DJA

10-02-2023

Michael Gerard Naessens, Plaintiff v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al., Defendants


ORDER CLOSING CASE

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Pro se plaintiff Michael Naessens sued the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (Metro); retired Philadelphia police detective Lawrence Richardson, Jr.; and Philadelphia Assistant District Attorney Amanda Hedrick for malicious prosecution and for violating his federal civil rights during his arrest and detention in Las Vegas, Nevada. Last summer, I dismissed his claims against Richardson and Hedrick for want of personal jurisdiction, and I dismissed the claims against Metro with limited leave to amend by July 17, 2023. I warned Naessens that if he “does not file an amended complaint by July 17, 2023, his § 1983 claim against Metro will be dismissed with prejudice, and the case will be closed without further notice.” That deadline passed without an amended complaint or any request to extend the deadline to file one. Because Naessens's failure to file an amended complaint leaves this court without any viable claims in this case, IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

ECF No. 49 at 11.


Summaries of

Naessens v. Las Vegas Metropolitian Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 2, 2023
2:22-cv-01438-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Naessens v. Las Vegas Metropolitian Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:Michael Gerard Naessens, Plaintiff v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 2, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01438-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 2, 2023)