Opinion
2:22-cv-01438-JAD-DJA
11-28-2022
MICHAEL GERARD NAESSENS, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT CCDC; BRADFORD T. MCLANE, CEO NAPHCARE, INC; LAWRENCE H. RICHARDSON, JR.; AMANDA LEIGH HEDRICK, Defendants
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP By Ethan M. Featherstone S. BRENT VOGEL ETHAN M. FEATHERSTONE Attorneys for Defendants NaphCare, Inc. and Bradford T. McLane, CEO NaphCare, Inc. Michael Gerard Naessens Plaintiff Pro Se MARQUIS AURBACH By Trisha R. Delos Santos Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant LVMPD CLARK HILL WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants, Lawrence H. Richardson, Jr. and Amanda Leigh Hedrick
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
By Ethan M. Featherstone
S. BRENT VOGEL
ETHAN M. FEATHERSTONE
Attorneys for Defendants NaphCare, Inc. and
Bradford T. McLane, CEO NaphCare, Inc.
Michael Gerard Naessens
Plaintiff Pro Se
MARQUIS AURBACH
By Trisha R. Delos Santos
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant LVMPD
CLARK HILL
WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ.
Attorney for Defendants,
Lawrence H. Richardson, Jr. and Amanda Leigh Hedrick
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY, AND DISMISS DEFENDANT BRADFORD T. MCLANE, CEO OF NAPHCARE, INC.
ECF NOS. 11, 32, 34
Defendant Bradford T. McLane, non-party NaphCare, Inc., by and through their counsel, S. Brent Vogel, Esq. and Ethan Featherstone, Esq. of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP, and Plaintiff Michael Gerard Naessens, pro se, hereby stipulate and agree that the Real Parties in Interest is “NaphCare, Inc.” and stipulate to substitute NaphCare, Inc. in lieu and stead of Bradford T. McLane, CEO of NaphCare, Inc. pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(c).
Upon substitution, NaphCare, Inc. will file its Response to the Complaint within fourteen (14) days, with a further fourteen days (14) to serve its initial disclosures pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1).
Upon substitution, Bradford T. McLane, CEO of NaphCare, Inc. will be dismissed with prejudice.
Upon substitution, NaphCare, Inc. will replace defendant Bradford T. McLane, CEO of NaphCare in the caption of Case No. 2:22-cv-01438-JAD-DJA.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation [34] and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. NaphCare, Inc. is substituted in the place of Bradford T. McLane, and the Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE McLane as a party and ADD NaphCare, Inc. as a party.
And because the termination of McLane as a party moots his motion to dismiss, IT IS ORDERED that McLane's motion to dismiss and the motion to strike Naessens'ssurreplytothatmotion [11] [32] are DENIED as moot.