Opinion
2:22-cv-01473-JAD-VCF
12-14-2022
MICHAEL GERARD NAESSENS, Plaintiff, v. FRANK BRESLIN, Philadelphia Revenue Commissioner; ANDREW J. BARRON; LAWRENCE H. RICHARDSON, JR.; and BART ELLIOTT LEVY Levy Law LLC, Defendants.
MICHAEL GERARD NAESSENS 304 S. Jones Boulevard #457 Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 Plaintiff, Pro Se CLARK HILL William D. Schuller, Esq. WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants, FRANK BRESLiN, ANDREW J. BARRON, and LAWRENCE H. RiCHARDSON, JR.
MICHAEL GERARD NAESSENS
304 S. Jones Boulevard #457
Las Vegas, Nevada 89107
Plaintiff, Pro Se
CLARK HILL
William D. Schuller, Esq.
WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendants,
FRANK BRESLiN, ANDREW J. BARRON, and LAWRENCE H. RiCHARDSON, JR.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ECF NOS. 17, 27
Jennifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District States
Plaintiff MICHAEL GERARD NAESSENS (“Naessens”), pro se, and Defendants FRANK BRESLIN (“Breslin”), ANDREW J. BARRON (“Barron”), and LAWRENCE H. RICHARDSON, JR. (“Richardson”), by and through their counsel at Clark Hill, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to FRCP 41(a):
1. That Naessens' claims against Breslin and Richardson are dismissed with prejudice;
2. That the Motion to Dismiss Defendants Frank Breslin and Lawrence H. Richardson, Jr. [ECF No. 17] should be denied as moot;
3. That this voluntary dismissal does not include Naessens' claims against Barron; and
4. That Naessens, Breslin, and Richardson are to bear their respective attorney's fees and costs as to Naessens' claims against Breslin and Richardson only.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ALL CLAIMS AGAINST Defendants Frank Breslin and Lawrence H. Richardson are DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs, and these defendants' motion to dismiss [ECF No. 17] is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendants Frank Breslin and Lawrence H. Richardson as parties.