From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nadel v. Zlotogura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

May, 1933.


Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the admission of plaintiff's Exhibit 3 in evidence was prejudicial error. We are of opinion that this exhibit, despite the claim that its purpose was to show the dimensions of the hall with reference to the location of the hole in the floor, had for its only purpose an exhibition of subsequent repairs. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nadel v. Zlotogura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Nadel v. Zlotogura

Case Details

Full title:JENNIE NADEL, Respondent, v. MARY ZLOTOGURA and Others, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)