From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nacoste v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 11, 1977
562 P.2d 986 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. A-76-09-12835, CA 7328

Argued March 28, 1977

Affirmed April 11, 1977

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Richard J. Burke, Judge.

Thomas E. Laury, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Paul J. Rask, Portland.

Edward H. Warren, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Chris P. Davis, and Hershiser, Mitchell Warren, Portland.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Johnson, Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Affirmed.


Claimant in this workmen's compensation case contends that she is permanently and totally disabled. Of the 14 doctors she saw after her accident, only one agrees with her. We agree with the referee's conclusion that "[t]he medical evidence * * * is persuasive that claimant's problems are emotional and largely unrelated to the accident. The awards she has received are more than adequate to cover actual physical disability * * *."

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Nacoste v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 11, 1977
562 P.2d 986 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Nacoste v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity

Case Details

Full title:NACOSTE, Appellant, v. CHUBB/PACIFIC INDEMNITY, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 11, 1977

Citations

562 P.2d 986 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
562 P.2d 986