From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Na Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 23, 2021
1:21-cv-00888 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00888 AWI JLT

08-23-2021

SUZANNE NA PIER, Plaintiff, v. RIDGECREST CINEMA, Defendant.


ORDER AFTER NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT (Doc. 7)

Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties report they have settled the matter and indicate will seek dismissal of the action soon. (Doc. 7 at 2) Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The stipulation to dismiss the action SHALL be filed no later than September 10, 2021 ;

2. All pending dates, conferences and hearings are VACATED.

The parties are advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the Court imposing sanctions, including the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Na Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 23, 2021
1:21-cv-00888 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Na Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE NA PIER, Plaintiff, v. RIDGECREST CINEMA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 23, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00888 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)