From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myrick v. Ives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2012
No. CIV 2:10-cv-1085-KJM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV 2:10-cv-1085-KJM-JFM (PC)

03-05-2012

DESHAWN MYRICK, Plaintiff, v. IVES, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed November 9, 2011, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Shank. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Myrick v. Ives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2012
No. CIV 2:10-cv-1085-KJM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Myrick v. Ives

Case Details

Full title:DESHAWN MYRICK, Plaintiff, v. IVES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 5, 2012

Citations

No. CIV 2:10-cv-1085-KJM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2012)