Summary
finding that it is the court itself that awards relief pursuant to N.Y. Lab. Law § 740
Summary of this case from Alpert v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.Opinion
February 11, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.).
The affidavit of respondent Meyer's former attorney that he formed respondent Grand-Perridine Development Corp. at Meyer's request and handed all of its stock over to him, and the mortgage documents signed by Meyer on behalf of Grand-Perridine, sufficed to show, prima facie, that Meyer, petitioner's judgment debtor, is the sole owner of Grand-Perridine stock. Respondents' unsubstantiated general denials in their answer to the petition raised no triable issues of fact concerning petitioner's entitlement to a lien against Grand-Perridine's 45% interest in Fox Meadow Associates.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ.