From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myles v. Busby

United States District Court, E.D. California, (Fresno Division)
Jun 24, 2009
No. 1:04-CV-5329-JAT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2009)

Opinion

No. 1:04-CV-5329-JAT.

June 24, 2009


ORDER


IT IS ORDERED that because Doc. #56 is directed at Defendant and not at the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall remove Doc. #56 from the Court's pending motion list.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for additional time to respond to Defendant's First Request for Production of Documents (Doc. #58) is granted to the limited extent that Plaintiff shall respond no later than July 13, 2009; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED confirming the July 24, 2009 discovery deadline and cautioning Plaintiff that because of this deadline there will be no further extensions;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's "inquiry" (Doc. #53) as to who will represent him at the upcoming mediation is "answered" in that Plaintiff is advised that the Court will not appoint any person or agency to represent Plaintiff at the mediation, Plaintiff must represent himself; and

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that if Plaintiff opposes Defendant's motion for leave to file an unenumerated 12(b) motion (Doc. #57), Plaintiff must file his opposition no later than July 6, 2009.


Summaries of

Myles v. Busby

United States District Court, E.D. California, (Fresno Division)
Jun 24, 2009
No. 1:04-CV-5329-JAT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Myles v. Busby

Case Details

Full title:Reynaldo Myles, Plaintiff, v. J. Busby, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, (Fresno Division)

Date published: Jun 24, 2009

Citations

No. 1:04-CV-5329-JAT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2009)