From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 23, 1983
442 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. AQ-104.

November 23, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Franklin County, Kenneth C. Cooksey, J.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gregory C. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


The only substantial issue presented by this appeal is whether appellant, a minor indicted by a grand jury for two counts of first-degree murder, was "transferred" within the meaning of section 39.02(5)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982), and thus entitled to findings of fact by the trial court as to why he should not be sentenced as a juvenile. We hold that such indictments are not "transfers" within the meaning of the statute and affirm.

Judge v. State, 408 So.2d 831, 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), held that such an indictment is a transfer within the meaning of section 39.02(5)(d). Judge, however, is no longer controlling, inasmuch as the Florida Legislature, by chapter 81-269, section 1, Laws of Florida, amended section 39.02(5)(d) by eliminating the word "indictment" from the statute. We therefore adopt the result of Postell v. State, 383 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) and find that there was no transfer as contemplated by the statute.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., JOANOS, J. and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Myers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 23, 1983
442 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Myers v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAY MYERS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 23, 1983

Citations

442 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Ramos v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Duke v. State, 541 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 1989); Myers v. State, 442 So.2d 272 (Fla. 1st DCA…

Duke v. State

Moreover, the Goodson courts' interpretation of section 958.04(1)(a) appears to be based on a flawed…