From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 6, 1990
557 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1962.

March 6, 1990.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ellen J. Morphonios, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.


Appellant, Bernard Myers, appeals his conviction for robbery. We affirm.

Appellant was charged with robbery for the taking of a victim's shoulder purse. At trial, the court instructed the jury on robbery and on the lesser charge of theft.

Appellant's only issue on appeal is that the trial court erred in giving a theft instruction which did not track the standard jury instruction. Appellant argues that the instruction given was misleading and confusing and led to appellant being improperly convicted of the robbery charge.

Although an initial transcript contained the error of which appellant complains, during this appeal the State filed a corrected transcript. The corrected transcript shows that the trial court properly gave the standard jury instruction for the theft charge. Fla.Std.Jury Instr. (Crim.) § 812.014. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Myers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 6, 1990
557 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Myers v. State

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD MYERS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 6, 1990

Citations

557 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Hunt v. State

It is appropriate to abide by the corrected transcript when it is available. See Myers v. State, 557 So. 2d…