But, "[t]he evaluation of whether a conviction is supported by the evidence is independent from-and irrelevant to-the assessment of whether verdicts are contradictory and irreconcilable." Myers v. State, 221 N.E.3d 694, 698 (Ind.Ct.App. 2023), trans. denied. Therefore, we now turn to our review of Green's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence for his Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon conviction.

When a party challenges the constitutionality of a statute, we start from the presumption that the statute is valid and impose a heavy burden on the challenging party to clearly overcome that presumption. Myers v. State, 221 N.E.3d 694, 699-700 (Ind. Ct. App. 2023), trans, denied. [3–6] [13] A party challenging the constitutionality of a statute may advance either a facial challenge or an as-applied challenge.