From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Koopman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02802-REB-MEH (D. Colo. May. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02802-REB-MEH

05-25-2012

JEREMY C. MYERS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN KOOPMAN, Defendants.

Randall Meyers Kent Campbell


MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY

Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes

FTR - Courtroom A501

Randall Meyers

Kent Campbell

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

MOTIONS HEARING

Court in session: 10:03 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Argument and discussion regarding Defendant's Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery (Doc. 201, filed 5/9/12) and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 203, filed 5/10/12). ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery (Doc. 201, filed 5/9/12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as stated on the record.

2. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 203, filed 5/10/12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as stated on the record.

3. Plaintiff's expert disclosures due by July 2, 2012. Defendant's expert disclosures due by August 1, 2012.

Court in recess: 11:10 a.m. (Hearing concluded)

Total time in court: 1:07


Summaries of

Myers v. Koopman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02802-REB-MEH (D. Colo. May. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Myers v. Koopman

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY C. MYERS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN KOOPMAN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 25, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02802-REB-MEH (D. Colo. May. 25, 2012)