Opinion
Civil Action H: 21-3033
09-26-2022
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANDREW S. HANEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 14-15); responses (Doc. Nos. 15,16, 24); replies (Doc. Nos. 17, 25, 26); responses and replies (Doc. Nos 17-18); Judge Sheldon's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) that the Court grant the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement and deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.
The Court has carefully reviewed, de novo, the filings, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, and agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that the Administrative Law Judge's findings as to Plaintiff's Residual Functional Capacity are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 21) are OVERRULED; the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is ADOPTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED; and, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Entry of this Order shall constitute entry of final judgment.