From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Hummel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 1, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00400-KMT-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00400-KMT-KLM

09-01-2011

BERNARD KENNETH MYERS, Plaintiff, v. DORWIN DWAYNE HUMMEL, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant's "Amended Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment And in the alternative Motion for Extension of Time to Respond" (Doc. No. 95, filed July 12, 2011) is DENIED to the extent it seeks (1) to strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 89, filed June 23, 2011) and (2) an award of reasonable fees and costs. Although Plaintiff has failed to fully comply with D.C.Colo.LCivR 56.1A, the court finds that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is not so "verbose, redundant, ungrammatical, or unintelligible" as to warrant that it be stricken under D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1H. Accordingly, pursuant to the minute order entered on July 26, 2011 (Doc. No. 101), Defendant shall have twenty-one days from the date of this order to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.


Summaries of

Myers v. Hummel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 1, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00400-KMT-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Myers v. Hummel

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD KENNETH MYERS, Plaintiff, v. DORWIN DWAYNE HUMMEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00400-KMT-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 1, 2011)