Opinion
2:21-cv-02246-RFB-NJK
01-27-2022
DESTINEE MYERS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Maryland corporation; DOES I-X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, Defendants.
Marc A. Saggese, Esq. NV Bar No. 7166 Marc J. Willoughby, Esq., NV Bar No. 14782 SAGGESE & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jonathan W. Carlson, Esq., NV Bar No. 10536 Frank A. Toddre, II, Esq., NV Bar No. 11474, Tayler D. Martinez, Esq., NV Bar No. 14921 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP, Attorneys for Defendant GEICO Choice Insurance
Marc A. Saggese, Esq. NV Bar No. 7166 Marc J. Willoughby, Esq., NV Bar No. 14782 SAGGESE & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jonathan W. Carlson, Esq., NV Bar No. 10536 Frank A. Toddre, II, Esq., NV Bar No. 11474, Tayler D. Martinez, Esq., NV Bar No. 14921 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP, Attorneys for Defendant GEICO Choice Insurance
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
RICHARD E. BOULWARE, II United States District Court
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties above named, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice and that all pending motions with the Court are withdrawn as moot.
Each party will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.