From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 10, 2006
924 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC05-1888.

February 10, 2006.

Lower Tribunal Nos. 4D05-1043, 2005-CA-76.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, LEWIS, QUINCE and CANTERO, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., would request a response.


Summaries of

Myers v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 10, 2006
924 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Myers v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:GARY B. MYERS A/K/A MUHAMMAD A. RAHIM, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES V. CROSBY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 10, 2006

Citations

924 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 2006)