From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 22, 1961
287 F.2d 400 (6th Cir. 1961)

Opinion

Nos. 14276, 14277.

February 22, 1961.

Charles Higby Smith, Waverly, Ohio, for petitioners.

Charles B.E. Freeman, Washington, D.C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A.F. Prescott, Charles B.E. Freeman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before SIMONS, Senior Judge, O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and THORNTON, District Judge.


ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised.

The determination of the Tax Court that the petitioners realized ordinary income in 1954 when they repossessed real estate (which they had sold in 1952 after owning the same for more than six months) under mutual agreement with the vendee that the contract of sale was not to be carried out, and that they were to retain that part of the purchase price which had already been paid them, is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Norman O. Tietjens of the Tax Court of the United States. T.C. Memo-1959-231, December 11, 1959.


Summaries of

Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 22, 1961
287 F.2d 400 (6th Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Paul F. MYERS and Dora Jane Myers, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 22, 1961

Citations

287 F.2d 400 (6th Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Handelman v. C. I. R

Mittleman, Smith, Melone, Boatman, and Johnson, supra. There need have been no specific provision for…