Opinion
Case No. 6:04-cv-1542-Orl-28DAB.
June 21, 2010
ORDER
This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Dissolve Charging Lien (Doc. No. 321) filed May 4, 2010. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be denied to the extent it seeks to dissolve the lien, but granted to the extent it seeks to strike the Notice of Lien, without prejudice to pursuing the claim in state court.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and consideration of the objections to the Report and Recommendation filed by Plaintiffs former counsel, Tietig Tietig, P.A. (Doc. No. 329), and Plaintiffs Opposition to Tietig Tietig, P.A.'s objections (Doc. No. 330), the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Report and Recommendation filed May 26, 2010 (Doc. No. 328) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Dissolve Charging Lien (Doc. No. 321) is DENIED to the extent it seeks to dissolve the lien, and GRANTED to the extent it seeks to strike the Notice of Lien, without prejudice to the parties pursuing their remedies in state court.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.