Summary
dismissing appeal of district court's order denying motion to quash subpoenas as interlocutory
Summary of this case from McCoy v. Ace Motor Acceptance Corp.Opinion
No. 12-1829
10-15-2012
SAMUEL H. MWABIRA-SIMERA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER ARTHUR L. EDMONDSON, JR.; SUPERVALU, INC., Defendants - Appellees.
Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera, Appellant Pro Se. Valerie Ann Thompson, BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland; Christopher Redmond Dunn, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00652-CCB) Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera, Appellant Pro Se. Valerie Ann Thompson, BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland; Christopher Redmond Dunn, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motions to quash subpoenas and for court appointed counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Mwabira-Simera seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Mwabira-Simera's motion for oral argument and grant Supervalu, Inc.'s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED