From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MVP Asset Mgmt. (Usa) LLC v. Vestbirk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02483-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02483-GEB-CMK

01-17-2012

MVP ASSET MANAGEMENT (USA) LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN VESTBIRK, et al., Defendants.

SULLIVAN JOHNSON LLP DANIEL M. SULLIVAN (SBN 132878) DANIEL A. JOHNSON (SBN 130724) Attorneys for Plaintiff MVP ASSET MANAGEMENT (USA) LLC GEORGE L. O'CONNELL (SBN 74037) TODD M. NOONAN (SBN 172962) DLA PIPER LLP (US) Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendants


SULLIVAN JOHNSON LLP

DANIEL M. SULLIVAN (SBN 132878)

DANIEL A. JOHNSON (SBN 130724)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MVP ASSET MANAGEMENT (USA) LLC

GEORGE L. O'CONNELL (SBN 74037)

TODD M. NOONAN (SBN 172962)

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

Attorneys for Specially

Appearing Defendants

[listed on signature page]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO (1) TEMPORARILY STAY ACTION; AND (2) CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE


Date: January 30, 2012

Dept: Courtroom 10

Judge: Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

1. WHEREAS, on October 28, 2011, the Court issued an Order setting a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for January 30, 2012, and requiring the parties to submit a Joint Report in connection therewith.

2. WHEREAS, on January 6, 2012, the Court signed an Order granting the motion of certain Specially Appearing Defendants to dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint in this action and granting Plaintiff leave to file a Third Amended Complaint on or before January 17, 2012.

3. WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Third Amended Complaint on January 16, 2012, which Third Amended Complaint includes claims under the federal securities laws.

4. WHEREAS, if called upon to respond, Specially Appearing Defendants have determined that they would file a motion (or motions) to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint on various grounds.

5. WHEREAS, under PLSRA (15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3)) "all discovery and other proceedings" in this matter would remain stayed pending resolution of Specially Appearing Defendants' motions to dismiss.

6. WHEREAS, no trial date or other case management dates have yet been set in this matter.

7. WHEREAS, the Parties through their Counsel of Record have also met and conferred concerning case management issues, including potential opportunities to resolve the action, and have agreed to request that the Court temporarily stay the action, including with respect to any response to the Third Amended Complaint, to allow the Parties to pursue settlement efforts while conserving the resources of the Parties and the Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties through their Counsel of Record, stipulate as follows:

1. That Specially Appearing Defendants are not making a general appearance through the filing of this Stipulation;

2. That, upon entry of the Order by the Court, the action will be STAYED for 90 days;

3. That, during the pendency of the stay, no response to the Third Amended Complaint need be filed;

4. That the briefing schedule established with respect to Specially Appearing Defendant Vestbirk in the Stipulation and Order approved by the Court on September 14, 2011 (Dkt. No. 103) is vacated;

5. That, absent further stipulation of the parties and/or order from the Court, Specially Appearing Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint shall be filed and served no later than 20 days after the expiration of the stay.

6. That, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, presently set for January 30, 2012, be continued approximately 120 days to a date available to the Court in or about June 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SULLIVAN JOHNSON LLP

By ___________________________

DANIEL A. JOHNSON

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MVP ASSET MANAGEMENT (USA) LLC

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

By ___________________________

TODD M. NOONAN

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendants

STEVEN VESTBIRK, JEFF BALLIET,

ALLISON HANSLIK, ARK ROYAL ASSET

MANAGEMENT, LTD.; VESTBIRK

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LTD.; ARK

ROYAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC; ARK

DISCOVERY, LLC; ARK ROYAL

HOLDINGS, LLC; ARK ROYAL SERVICES,

LLC; ARK ROYAL CAPITAL, LLC; ARK

ROYAL CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC; ARK

ROYAL CAPITAL, INC.; ARK ROYAL

RESOURCES, LLC; ARK ROYAL

ASSURANCE LLC; ARK ROYAL

INVESTMENTS, LLC

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties as set forth herein, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. The action is STAYED in its entirety for 90 days from the date of entry of this Order.

2. Specially Appearing Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint shall be filed and served no later than 20 days after the expiration of the stay, absent further order from the Court.

3. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, presently set for January 30, 2012, is continued to June 25, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

MVP Asset Mgmt. (Usa) LLC v. Vestbirk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02483-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

MVP Asset Mgmt. (Usa) LLC v. Vestbirk

Case Details

Full title:MVP ASSET MANAGEMENT (USA) LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02483-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)