From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Haynes

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 24, 1945
149 F.2d 483 (6th Cir. 1945)

Opinion

No. 9972.

May 24, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; John H. Druffel, Judge.

Action by Katherine Haynes against the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York to recover on a life and accident policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Peck, Shaffer Williams, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Graydon, Head Ritchey, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, HAMILTON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.


It appearing that the cause of the death of the insured under the life and accident insurance policy involved in this case is a question of medical science, and as the expert medical testimony in the record based on evidential facts is conflicting as to whether the insured's death was caused primarily by his infirmities and, without their presence, death would not have occurred, or was caused primarily by a fall, the issue was one for the jury, and wherefore the only error assigned is the failure of the trial court to direct a verdict, the judgment is affirmed. Bridge v. Metropolitan L. Insurance Company, 142 Ohio St. 521, 53 N.E.2d 350; Painesville Utopia Theatre Company v. Lautermilch, 118 Ohio St. 167, 160 N.E. 683; United States Casualty Co. v. Thrush, 21 Ohio App. 129, 152 N.E. 796.


Summaries of

Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Haynes

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 24, 1945
149 F.2d 483 (6th Cir. 1945)
Case details for

Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. HAYNES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: May 24, 1945

Citations

149 F.2d 483 (6th Cir. 1945)

Citing Cases

Cameron v. New York Life Insurance Co.

The jury has resolved the issues in favor of the plaintiffs on substantial evidence that the death of the…