Opinion
October 25, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The record raises triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212) as to whether the plaintiff waived timely performance on the part of the defendants (see, Ranfro Dev. Corp. v. Home Funding Co., 26 A.D.2d 955). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, we also find that the defendants' actions on the day finally set for closing did not constitute an anticipatory breach of the parties' contract (see, Calamari Perillo, Contracts § 12-3, at 521 [3d ed]). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.