From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muthana v. Kane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Apr 24, 2012
No. 12-CV-00032-PHX-PGR (MHB) (D. Ariz. Apr. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-CV-00032-PHX-PGR (MHB)

04-24-2012

Abdulla Qasem Muthana, Petitioner, v. Katrina S. Kane, Respondent.


ORDER

The Court having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Burns, and no party having filed an objection,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court.

Petitioner alleged in his habeas petition that his detention was unlawful under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). Petitioner having been removed from the United States on February 27, 2012, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the petition be dismissed as moot. (Doc. 11 at 2.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as moot and without prejudice.

____________

Paul G. Rosenblatt

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Muthana v. Kane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Apr 24, 2012
No. 12-CV-00032-PHX-PGR (MHB) (D. Ariz. Apr. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Muthana v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:Abdulla Qasem Muthana, Petitioner, v. Katrina S. Kane, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

No. 12-CV-00032-PHX-PGR (MHB) (D. Ariz. Apr. 24, 2012)