Opinion
No. 101884-3
09-06-2023
MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. David C. COTTINGHAM, et al., Petitioners.
ORDER
¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Johnson, Owens, Gordon McCloud, and Montoya-Lewis, considered at its September 5, 2023, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶3 That the petition for review is denied and the Respondent's request for an award of attorney fees as a sanction is granted pursuant to RAP 18.9. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses incurred in filing an answer to the petition for review. The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.
For the Court
/s/ González, J.
CHIEF JUSTICE