From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muszynski v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 30, 2008
No. CIV S-04-0082 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-0082 JAM GGH P.

October 30, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's October 16, 2008 motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket #64) is denied.


Summaries of

Muszynski v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 30, 2008
No. CIV S-04-0082 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Muszynski v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:MARK S. MUSZYNSKI, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-04-0082 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2008)