From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Musudi v. Ford Motor Credit Company Diblasi Motors

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jul 31, 2008
07-CV-1082 (CBA) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-1082 (CBA) (LB).

July 31, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiffs have filed a pro se action pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and the Equal Credit Opportunities Act ("ECOA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1691, et seq. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This Court referred defendants' motion to the Honorable Lois Bloom, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

This Court has received the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bloom dated May 23, 2008, recommending that this Court grant defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims with leave to replead the ECOA claim only. No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation of October 22, 2007 as its opinion. Plaintiffs have twenty days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from a judgment entered herein would not be taken in good faith and that in forma pauperis status should be denied for purpose of any appeal.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Musudi v. Ford Motor Credit Company Diblasi Motors

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jul 31, 2008
07-CV-1082 (CBA) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Musudi v. Ford Motor Credit Company Diblasi Motors

Case Details

Full title:HAYAT MUSUDI, PALWASH MASUDI Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jul 31, 2008

Citations

07-CV-1082 (CBA) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.

There are no court decisions finding the ECOA and the FHA do not permit disparate impact actions in light of…

M T Mortgage Corp. v. White

There is an argument on this basis that they cannot make out a prima facie case under the ECOA or the FHA.…