From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Musto v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 4, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-1182 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 4, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-1182

11-04-2015

JOSEPH JOHN MUSTO, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 10) of Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn, recommending the court grant the motion (Doc. 8) by defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), and dismiss as untimely the appeal (Doc. 1) of plaintiff Joseph John Musto ("Musto") from the decision of the administrative law judge denying his application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits, and, following an independent review of the record, and noting that Musto failed to oppose the Commissioner's motion to dismiss, see LOCAL RULE OF COURT 7.6, the court being in agreement with Judge Cohn that Musto's appeal is untimely, and it appearing that neither party has filed objections to the report, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record, see Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007), it is hereby ORDERED that:

When parties fail to timely object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the Federal Magistrates Act does not require a district court to review the report before accepting it. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Third Circuit has admonished that "failure of a party to object to a magistrate's legal conclusions may result in the loss of the right to de novo review in the district court." Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987); see also Tice v. Wilson, 425 F. Supp. 2d 676, 680 (W.D. Pa. 2006); Oldrati v. Apfel, 33 F. Supp. 2d 397, 399 (E.D. Pa. 1998); Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375-78 (M.D. Pa. 1998). As a matter of good practice, however, the Third Circuit expects courts to "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by" a magistrate judge's report. Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878. The court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report in accordance with this Third Circuit directive. --------

1. The report (Doc. 10) of Magistrate Judge Cohn is ADOPTED.

2. The motion (Doc. 8) to dismiss by defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security, is GRANTED.

3. The complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Musto v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 4, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-1182 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Musto v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH JOHN MUSTO, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 4, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-1182 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 4, 2015)