From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mustin v. Wainwright

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 21, 2023
3:21-cv-321 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-321

09-21-2023

Keith Mustin, Plaintiff, v. Warden Lyneal Wainwright, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JEFFREY J. HELMICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE,

Plaintiff Keith Mustin has filed a motion to proceed on appeal without prepaying the appellate filing fee. (Doc. No. 30).

Section 1915 provides “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). A court may grant a motion to proceed in forma pauperis if the issues are arguable on their merits, even if the petitioner cannot show a probability of success on the merits. See, e.g., Foster v. Ludwick, 208 F.Supp.2d 750, 765 (E.D. Mich. 2002). I conclude the issues Bloodworth raises are not frivolous, even if he is unlikely to succeed on appeal, and I grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Doc. No. 30).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Mustin v. Wainwright

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 21, 2023
3:21-cv-321 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Mustin v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:Keith Mustin, Plaintiff, v. Warden Lyneal Wainwright, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-321 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)