Opinion
CASE NO.: SC14-2097
01-13-2015
JAMES MUSTERS Petitioner(s) v. EVERHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY Respondent(s)
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 5D14-479; 422009CA003567AXXXXX
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
/s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
tw
Served:
KIMBERLY NOLEN HOPKINS
JAMES MUSTERS
HON. DAVID R. ELLSPERMANN, CLERK
HON. PAMELA R. MASTERS, CLERK
DANIEL J. MASON, JR.
KATHERINE BENNETT
JOHNNY FISHER
FREDA FISHER
JOHN HENSHAW
ROD NEUMAN