From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MUSTAFA v. BECK

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
May 19, 2009
1:08CV892 (M.D.N.C. May. 19, 2009)

Opinion

1:08CV892.

May 19, 2009


ORDER


On April 2, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.

The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss (docket no. 4) is granted, that the petition (docket no. 1) is dismissed, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

MUSTAFA v. BECK

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
May 19, 2009
1:08CV892 (M.D.N.C. May. 19, 2009)
Case details for

MUSTAFA v. BECK

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ABDULLAH MUSTAFA, Petitioner, v. THEODIS BECK, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

1:08CV892 (M.D.N.C. May. 19, 2009)