From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Musgrove v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 23, 1952
156 Tex. Crim. 606 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952)

Opinion

No. 25661.

January 23, 1952.

Appeal from the District Court of San Jacinto County, W. B. Browder, J.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.


Appellant was adjudged to be in contempt of court by reason of his violation of an injunction against maintaining a common nuisance, and attempts to appeal from the imposition of a fine of $100 for such contempt.

In Lawley v. State, 117 Tex.Crim. R., 36 S.W.2d 1035, we said: 'We are concerned with one thing only in the motion, and that is the proposition that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal. No doubt exists as to the correctness of the proposition. An appeal does not lie from a judgment of contempt. Crow v. State, 24 Tex. 12; Ex parte Kilgore, 3 Tex.App. [247] 249; Carter v. State, 4 Tex. App. 165[ 4 Tex.Crim. 165], Borrer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 63 S.W. 630; Borrer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 63 S.W. 1133; Long v. State, 82 Tex.Crim. R., 199 S.W. 619, 620, in which the following language is found: 'From a judgment of contempt this court can give relief only on writ of habeas corpus when the relator is in custody."

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Musgrove v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 23, 1952
156 Tex. Crim. 606 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952)
Case details for

Musgrove v. State

Case Details

Full title:MUSGROVE v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 23, 1952

Citations

156 Tex. Crim. 606 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952)
245 S.W.2d 263

Citing Cases

Ex parte Curry

Contempt orders, however, are not reviewable by direct appeal, regardless of whether the contempt finding is…