From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Musgrove v. Achaelis

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 11, 1922
93 So. 387 (Ala. 1922)

Opinion

6 Div. 580.

May 11, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; J. J. Curtis, Judge.

Ernest Lacy and Bankhead Bankhead, all of Jasper, for appellants.

The bill is defective in its prayer for solicitor's fee. Code 1907, § 3010.

A. F. Fite, of Jasper, for appellee.

Prayer for solicitor's fee is not necessary, and allowance thereof is proper, without reference thereto in the bill. 205 Ala. 180, 87 So. 803; 195 Ala. 560, 70 So. 733; 60 So. 391.


This bill, filed by appellee against L. B. Musgrove and others, seeks the sale of lands for division of the proceeds among tenants in common. The bill's averments of the necessity for the sale for division are sufficient. Musgrove v. Aldridge, 205 Ala. 189, 87 So. 803, and authorities therein cited. The description of the real estate is not void upon its face.

The ground of demurrer addressed to the feature of the bill praying the ascertainment and payment of attorney's fees, in the contingency prescribed in the statute, was overruled without error; that phase of the prayer being surplusage. Smith v. Witcher, 180 Ala. 102, 105, 60 So. 391.

The decree overruling the demurrers of appellants is affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Musgrove v. Achaelis

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 11, 1922
93 So. 387 (Ala. 1922)
Case details for

Musgrove v. Achaelis

Case Details

Full title:MUSGROVE et al. v. ACHAELIS

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 11, 1922

Citations

93 So. 387 (Ala. 1922)
93 So. 387

Citing Cases

Latimer v. Milford

A cross-bill, to the extent that it seeks a solicitor's fee, is not properly tested by demurrer. Smith v.…

Hinson v. Cook

No further averment as to administration of the estate was necessary. Leddon v. Strickland, 218 Ala. 436, 118…