From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murse v. Murse

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 23, 2024
No. 24-1057 (3d Cir. Apr. 23, 2024)

Opinion

24-1057

04-23-2024

ADAM I. MURSE, Appellant v. MARY L. MURSE


On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-03829) District Judge: Honorable Jeffrey L. Schmehl

PETITION FOR REHEARING

BEFORE: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, and JORDAN, HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, CHUNG, Circuit Judges

Paul B. Matey Circuit Judge

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file the amended opinion and judgment contemporaneously with this order. The revisions to the opinion are at pages 2 and 4-5.

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant also having been submitted to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED.


Summaries of

Murse v. Murse

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 23, 2024
No. 24-1057 (3d Cir. Apr. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Murse v. Murse

Case Details

Full title:ADAM I. MURSE, Appellant v. MARY L. MURSE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 23, 2024

Citations

No. 24-1057 (3d Cir. Apr. 23, 2024)