From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Zenzen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 28, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 62644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. CA 13-01944

01-28-2014

IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM MURRAY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SHERYL ZENZEN, THOMAS TANEA AND NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.


PRESENT: , P. J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.

Respondents having moved to dismiss the appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Seneca on January 29, 2013, on the ground that an appeal does not lie from an order denying reargument,

Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Julie M. Sheridan, Esq., dated January 7, 2014, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed without costs (see Schenectady Chems. v Imitec, Inc., 169 AD2d 1016).

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk


Summaries of

Murray v. Zenzen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 28, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 62644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Murray v. Zenzen

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM MURRAY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SHERYL ZENZEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 28, 2014

Citations

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 62644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)