From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug 30, 2012
100 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. 2012)

Opinion

No. SC12–658.

2012-08-30

Gerald Delane MURRAY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that appellate review would not provide an adequate remedy, Petitioner's petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition is hereby denied. See Trepal v. State, 754 So.2d 702, 707 (Fla.2000) (”[T]o obtain relief an appellant must establish that the order compelling discovery does not conform to the essential requirements of law and may cause irreparable injury for which appellate review will be inadequate.).

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug 30, 2012
100 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. 2012)
Case details for

Murray v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gerald Delane MURRAY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

100 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. 2012)