From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Oct 16, 2013
77 A.3d 272 (Del. 2013)

Opinion

No. 294 2013.

2013-10-16

Jonathan MURRAY, a/k/a Yah–Ya Mandelaka, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.


Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, Cr. ID 30700321DI.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and BERGER, Justices.

ORDER


RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice.

This 4th day of October 2013, after careful consideration of the opening brief, the State's motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated April 17, 2013. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's third motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Oct 16, 2013
77 A.3d 272 (Del. 2013)
Case details for

Murray v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan MURRAY, a/k/a Yah–Ya Mandelaka, Defendant Below–Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Oct 16, 2013

Citations

77 A.3d 272 (Del. 2013)