Murray v. State

Full title: ELEA LEE MURRAY, III APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court: ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

2011 Ark. App. 625 (Ark. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. CACR10-704

10-26-2011

ELEA LEE MURRAY, III APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART

APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2007-1103]

HONORABLE DAVID N. LASER,

JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART , Judge

This court ordered rebriefing in Murray v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 431, wherein the court recounted this case's procedural history and explained why counsel's brief failed to satisfy the requirements for an appeal in which counsel asserted that the appeal was without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k). Counsel now has filed a new, no-merit brief. The clerk of this court furnished the new brief to appellant and notified him of his right to file pro se points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant did not do so.

After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we hold that counsel has filed a complying no-merit brief and conclude that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant the motion filed by counsel to withdraw and affirm.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., agree.