From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 22, 1982
642 S.W.2d 313 (Ark. 1982)

Opinion

No. CR 81-88

Opinion delivered November 22, 1982

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — POSTCONVICTION RELIEF. — Where the petitioner alleges that counsel's representation of the petitioner and a co-defendant amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel decided not to call the petitioner to testify since his testimony would have been damaging to his co-defendant and exculpatory with respect to himself, the motion for Rule 37, postconviction relief, should be granted.

Petition for Postconviction Relief pursuant to Arkansas Criminal Procedure Rule 37; granted in part and denied in part.

Jack Lassiter, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Alice Ann Burns, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Petitioner Benny Murray was convicted with his co-defendant Patricia Langford of two counts of selling marijuana. We affirmed. Murray Langford v. State, 275 Ark. 46, 628 S.W.2d 549 (1982). Murray now seeks permission to proceed in circuit court for post-conviction relief pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37.

Petitioner raises several grounds for relief, but only one allegation, designated VIII in the petition, raises a ground sufficient to grant permission to proceed in circuit court under Rule 37. He alleges in Paragraph VIII that counsel's representation of both him and Langford as co-defendants amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel because their interests conflicted substantially. He cites counsel's decision not to call him as a witness as support for the allegation. He asserts that he would have testified, if called, that Langford initiated' and consummated the marijuana sales; therefore, since his testimony would have been damaging to Langford and exculpatory with respect to him, there was no way for counsel to represent both defendants without prejudice to him.

We find that the allegation presents a question which warrants our granting permission for petitioner to file a petition for post-conviction relief in circuit court limited to the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel as discussed herein. In all other respects the petition is denied.

Affirmed in part and denied in part.


Summaries of

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 22, 1982
642 S.W.2d 313 (Ark. 1982)
Case details for

Murray v. State

Case Details

Full title:Benny MURRAY v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 22, 1982

Citations

642 S.W.2d 313 (Ark. 1982)
642 S.W.2d 313