From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, and the third-party complaint is dismissed, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

We agree with the appellant's contention that there is no basis to hold him liable for the happening of the accident between a moped driven by the plaintiff and an automobile driven by the defendant third-party plaintiff, Frederick J. Schmidt. The record establishes that the plaintiff's view was not obstructed, prior to the accident, by the hedges on the appellant's property. The record also establishes that Schmidt was looking away from the hedges, to his left, for oncoming traffic prior to making a right turn. It appears from the record that the accident occurred either when the plaintiff's vehicle turned left and entered the lane of traffic occupied by the defendant's vehicle or when the defendant's vehicle turned right too widely and entered the lane of traffic occupied by the plaintiff's vehicle. Clearly, the hedges on the appellant's property abutting the intersection played no part in the happening of the accident. We therefore hold, as a matter of law, that the hedges were not a proximate cause of the accident. Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murray v. Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Murray v. Schmidt

Case Details

Full title:JOHN K. MURRAY et al., Respondents, v. FREDERICK J. SCHMIDT, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

Estate of Cook v. Gomez

P established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that Carlos…

Beyer v. Sterling

The Supreme Court denied Berry Hill Realty's motion on the ground that a question of fact existed as to…