From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Pesce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1354 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-05505.

September 29, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Michael Pesce, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to vacate the sentence imposed upon the petitioner on April 12, 1984, under indictment No. 3557/83, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Roberta L. Martin of counsel), for respondent Michael Pesce.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Dillon, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

Murray v. Pesce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1354 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Murray v. Pesce

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEXTER MURRAY, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL PESCE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 1354 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6850
885 N.Y.S.2d 609

Citing Cases

In re Murray

Decided February 18, 2010. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 65 AD3d 1354. Motions for Leave to Appeal…