From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. McCoy

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 28, 2023
CIVIL 1:21-cv-320 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:21-cv-320

02-28-2023

BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY, Plaintiff v. COLLEEN MCCOY, etal., Defendants


ORDER

Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 28th of February, 2023, upon consideration of Defendants' motion (Doc. 48) for summary judgment, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and in opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion (Doc. 48) for summary judgment on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative remedies is DENIED.
2. The motion (Doc. 48) is GRANTED in all other respects.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.
4. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case.
5. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).


Summaries of

Murray v. McCoy

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 28, 2023
CIVIL 1:21-cv-320 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Murray v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY, Plaintiff v. COLLEEN MCCOY, etal., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

CIVIL 1:21-cv-320 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2023)