From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Interstate Distributor Company

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2006
No. 2:05-cv-0154-MCE-PAN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cv-0154-MCE-PAN.

February 10, 2006


ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION


Pursuant to the representations of the attorney for defendants, the court has determined that this case is settled.

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160, dispositional documents are to be filed on or before March 1, 2006.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel as well as any party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murray v. Interstate Distributor Company

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2006
No. 2:05-cv-0154-MCE-PAN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Murray v. Interstate Distributor Company

Case Details

Full title:GRETCHEN F. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTOR COMPANY; KEITH A…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2006

Citations

No. 2:05-cv-0154-MCE-PAN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)