From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Holyoke Sch. Dist. Re-1J

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01989-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01989-CMA-KLM

12-12-2012

SHARON MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. HOLYOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1J, HOLYOKE SCHOOL BOARD, and HOLYOKE HIGH SCHOOL, Defendants.


Judge Christine M. Arguello


ORDER ADOPTING NOVEMBER 26, 2012 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the November 26, 2012 Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix that former Defendants Kris Camblin, Linda Jelden, Daniel Kafka, Kimbra Killin, Jon King, Jeff Tharp, Bret Miles and Susan Ortner's (collectively, the "Individual Defendants") Motion to Dismiss Third Claim for Relief Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) be denied as moot. (Doc. # 19.)

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 19 at 2.) Despite this advisement, no objections to Magistrate Judge Mix's Recommendation have been filed. "In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.").

Based on the Court's review, the Court finds that "there is no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mix as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 19) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Third Claim for Relief Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) (Doc. # 12) be DENIED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Murray v. Holyoke Sch. Dist. Re-1J

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01989-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Murray v. Holyoke Sch. Dist. Re-1J

Case Details

Full title:SHARON MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. HOLYOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1J, HOLYOKE SCHOOL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01989-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2012)