From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. H.D.S.P. Medical Care

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 13, 2005
No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P.

October 13, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed June 10, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Brown. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Brown be dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Murray v. H.D.S.P. Medical Care

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 13, 2005
No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Murray v. H.D.S.P. Medical Care

Case Details

Full title:JAMES TAYLOR MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. H.D.S.P. MEDICAL CARE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 13, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2005)