From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 7, 2023
21-cv-6718 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-6718 (LJL)

11-07-2023

ROBERT LEE MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

Defendants' letter motion, Dkt. No. 72, is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a letter with the Court that provides a physical description of the Doe Defendants by November 29, 2023. See Bishop v. City of New York, 2016 WL 4484245, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016); Cato v. Zweller, 2023 WL 2352922, at *1-2 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2023). If Plaintiff fails to do so, Defendants will be relieved of their Valentin obligations to assist Plaintiff in identifying the Doe Defendants. See Vassel v. Palisades Funding Corp., 2022 WL 20690152, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 6201737 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 2023).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murray v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 7, 2023
21-cv-6718 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Murray v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 7, 2023

Citations

21-cv-6718 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2023)